3 個留言

1. 
   impressionsobscure · 2019-01-12 12:57

   No no, thank you. But how did you get this shot? I could imagine how you could get it without 1k watts and it does not appear to have a flash. I, used to know all of this but almost always used continual lighting. I am correct in the thought that if I, for instance, shot a subject with an instant back (800iso) than I will get a similar shot with 100 iso, 800 to 400 to 100 -2 stops correct? I intend to find a freaking mentor and start doing my own processing and printing but I cannot afford to ruin a ton of film. I realize that I can push and pull the processing but I am avoiding this until I develop a more instinctual relationship with Diana. I apologize for the questions but I do not have much money or a darkroom any more I want to be sure that my math is correct prior to developing. I worked, twenty years ago, for a fairly well known photographer, and I can only find information online that is either to simple or to complicated. Any suggestions? Thanks, -Justin

2. 
   lizkoppert · 2019-01-12 23:31

   It was taken SO many years ago, I have trouble remembering. But if it DOES serve me correctly, it was just the flash on one of these: inauspicious.org/cameras/agx/

3. 
   lizkoppert · 2019-01-12 23:37

   @impressionsobscure, I'm fairly new to the more technical side of things, myself, despite getting a Chinon Auto GX when I was about 8. So when people start talking about pushing and pulling, that's getting a little over my head. It's a bit grim when you gotta get an analogue SLR to learn apertures and shutter speeds, because your entry level DSLR's hardly ever out of auto mode :)