IR pinholes with a Diana F+

The F+ accepts a 52mm filter with the rim removed, placed in the film chamber. The debris you see was on the filter.
All exposures about 4 minutes in bright sun and with a 720nm filter.
The negative was too dense at that exposure, so probably 2 or even 1 minute would have been better.
Yes, I know, my framing sucks.

攝影師：: adash
上載：: 2013-05-17
標籤：: b&w dandelion flower flowers infrared ir park pinhole plants tree trees vegetation
相機：: Lomography Diana F+ (Lomography 線上商店有售)
菲林：: Rollei Retro 80S
城市：: Sofia
國家／地區：: Bulgaria
Year:: 2013
Time:: afternoon
相簿：: IR pinholes with a Diana F+

95 個喜歡

egoriceman, alexander_krolikowski, neufotomacher, grandphilippe, paranoid_expectation, iwnilom, norris, bnjmn, naiseta, wuxiong, selina-p, konbiw, jangeisen, un_peu_de_soleil, murdoc_niccals, herbert-4, cocaneonkamerasutra, analaya, tatocientos, dreamseller, gauthierdumonde, fleetfox, sahar, enial, ditchbitch, cosettex, bkspicture, npkishi, alexyz, sirio174, mapix, zorzyo, kja, grinningcat, davidb, mllev, rewd, fartstorm, kaffeeschwester, nafamoss, _smg_, achmad-magabutz, thejomi, amytam, frau_inga, agiel, badjuju, ricoinbrooklyn, kitija, af-capture, -dakota-, sjuli83, opon21, emkei, ohlordy, jabuka, dakadev_pui, jazon, meryl, alburnkat, neanderthalis, vicker313, bravopires, revolutionary13, novotao, kylesherman, cryboy, vicuna, deepfried_goodness, kibs, pixiecloud, ekeupratama, kleeblatt, aanum, tesatscad, earthquake, alexes, clickiemcpete, aton, oleman, marieta, kangiha, gatokinetik-o, atria007, grazie, why-yu, kelvin_wx, ishifishy, edenhovenga, 134340, sobetion, saidseni, he-mo, mafiosa & maria_vlachou 共有 59 個人喜歡減少顯示數目

7 個留言

mafiosa · 2013-05-17 16:41
Wow!! Love it <3
kibs · 2013-05-17 20:23
Great album! I always learn something when I read your descriptions :)
davidb · 2013-05-22 15:50
I don't always understand your technical explanations, but the result...Wow!
sirio174 · 2013-05-27 20:35
No problem with the plastic back of the Diana with IR films? The heat from the hand seem to do not create problems here...
adash · 2013-05-27 20:41
@mafiosa @kibs @davidb Thanks, Thanks, Thanks!
@sirio174 No. This film is not sensitive to deep IR, where the thermal radiation seems to be. No problem, just make sure you load it in subdued light, as the label says.
herbert-4 · 2013-07-18 16:27
Wonderful, wonderful album!! Most IR, today, cuts off at ~800 or less. The real Kodak High Speed IR cut off ~950. Some film maker needs to bring back the Kodak chemistry!!
rx4bluz · 2013-09-02 19:48
awesome ir pinhole work...

IR pinholes with a Diana F+

95 個喜歡

7 個留言

More photos by adash